hamburger-nav-icon
region-flag-icon
Search by Category
Audio
Cameras
Cases & Bags
Computers & Software
Conferencing
Content Management
Control
Displays
Furniture
Lighting & Studio
Mounts & Rigging
Networking & Cabling
Power
Presentation
Production
Security & Safety
Signal Management
Search by Category
EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseSpanish
magstor
Request
More Information
Project List
Do not use LTO drives in a vertical orientation
Posted on Friday, February 12, 2021
Do not use LTO drives in a vertical orientation

Feb. 12, 2021 -

LTO 8 mounting orientation effects on Tape drive performance

Abstract: The topic of the preferred mounting orientation of tape drives has been discussed for decades, clearly the drive mounting orientation will alter the head mass effect on the servo loop performance when the head is suspended by the actuator or resting on the guides. Over the years, number of tests were conducted on various DLT drives and even decades ago, the data showed a preferred drive mounting orientation can influence drive performance. Considering that quick review of the LTO8 shows the similar drive architecture to DLT, the question has remained unanswered if the drive mounting orientation can affect the drive performance. This study was recently requested by MagStor to quantify the effect of the mounting orientation on the LTO8 drive performance. The tests were conducted on a new IBM LTO8 IBM Tape Drive supplied by Magstor, (Magstor PN SAS-HL8-8088), the standard Tape drive Doctor advanced test routines was used to conduct the tests.

The topic of the preferred mounting orientation of tape drives has been discussed for decades, clearly the drive mounting orientation will alter the drive head mass effect on the servo loop performance when the head is suspended by the actuator or resting on the guides. Also the drive mounting orientation could affect the dynamics of the tape lateral tape motion as it spools onto the reels and even the head to tape interface could affect the sensitive read/write

performance. Due to the complexity of the system interaction, the first order of this analysis was to design a simulated customer test to determine if we can detect any orientation effects. Over the years, number of tests were conducted on various DLT drives and even decades ago, the test data showed a preferred drive mounting orientation, considering the LTO8 has similar drive architecture to DLT, the question regarding the effect of tape drive mounting orientation on the drive performance of LTO drives has remained largely unanswered.

This study was recently commissioned by Magstor to quantify the effect of the mounting orientation on the LTO8 drive performance. The tests were conducted on a new IBM LTO8 Tape Drive supplied by Magstor, (Magstor PN SAS-HL8-8088), using the standard Tape drive Doctor advanced test routines.

First few words about Tape Drive Doctor tool. TDD was originally developed and patented by Quantum Corporation and later advanced by Saliba Technologies Corporation. The objective of this tool is to quickly test LTO drives performance during simulate customer read/write operations and cartridge read/write interchange using calibrated cartridges. This tools has been used extensively by drive repair companies and more information regarding the technology and patents can be found at TapedriveDoctor.com.

TDD basic routine consist of reading and writing customer data at specific tape locations, by measuring the time of various operations, a figure of merit of the drive performance is reported. TDD also interrogate the drive error rates and servo defects so at the end of the test, we have a full 360 degrees results representing tape drive performance. All TDD test cartridges are calibrated to a gold standard, and the results are purely the drive performance. The quality

value is linearized and normalize. The value of 3, represent the centerline drive, a lower value is better than average and higher value represent a worse than average drive. For complete picture, we will report the raw data reported by the drive, the actual process time and normalize performance.

For the test, a new IBM LTO8 drive serial number YY1097006353 supplied by MagStor was used. The two orientations tested were according to the instruction of the drive manufacture, first the horizontal direction two passes. Second, two passes in the vertical direction. Special attention was taken to insulate the drive from any possible outside vibration to purely measure the effect of the mountain orientation.

For the first set of tests, the drive mounted in the horizontal direction.

Below are the timing data as reported by TDD test portion of writing 5000 blocks repeated 8 cycles when the drive mounted in the horizontal direction.

LTO8 First test horizontal reverse direction

  • 01/18/2021 15.38.53.328 Wr Rev Process Time Cycle 1 in Milliseconds
  • 01/18/2021 15.38.53.375 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
  • 01/18/2021 15.38.53.406 gCPW_TimeRev Normalized
  • 01/18/2021 15.38.53.468 3.022 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000

LTO8 Second test horizontal reverse direction

  • 01/18/2021 16.42.56.859 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
  • 01/18/2021 16.42.56.890 gCPW_TimeRev Normalized
  • 01/18/2021 16.42.56.953 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000

LTO8 First test horizontal forward direction

  • 01/18/2021 15.40.28.796 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
  • 01/18/2021 15.40.28.828 gCPW_TimeFwd Normalized
  • 01/18/2021 15.40.28.890 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000

LTO8 Second test horizontal forward direction

  • 01/18/2021 16.44.32.375 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
  • 01/18/2021 16.44.32.406 gCPW_TimeFwd Normalized
  • 01/18/2021 16.44.32.468 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000

For the second set of tests, the drive mounted in the vertical direction.

Below are the timing data as reported by TDD test portion of writing 5000 blocks repeated 8 cycles when the drive mounted in the vertical direction.

LTO8 First test vertical writing in the reverse direction

  • 01/18/2021 15.51.41.500 8 3 2 2 2 2 2 2
  • 01/18/2021 15.51.41.531 gCPW_TimeRev Normalized
  • 01/18/2021 15.51.41.609 12.176 4.773 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000

LTO8 Second test vertical writing in the reverse direction

  • 01/18/2021 16.09.25.796 7 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
  • 01/18/2021 16.09.25.812 gCPW_TimeRev Normalized
  • 01/18/2021 16.09.25.875 11.140 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000
  • 3.000 3.000

LTO8 First test vertical writing in the forward direction

  • 01/18/2021 15.53.39.531 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
  • 01/18/2021 15.53.39.578 gCPW_TimeFwd Normalized
  • 01/18/2021 15.53.39.656 3.055 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000
  • 3.000 3.000

LTO8 second test vertical writing in the forward direction

  • 01/18/2021 16.21.44.125 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
  • 01/18/2021 16.21.44.171 gCPW_TimeFwd Normalized
  • 01/18/2021 16.21.44.234 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000 3.000
  • 3.000 3.000

Horizontal, first pass LTO8 servo data

  • 01/18/2021 15.39.52.031 Servo stop write Fwd : 0
  • 01/18/2021 15.39.52.046 Servo stop write Rev : 0
  • 01/18/2021 15.39.52.062 Write skip Fwd : 363
  • 01/18/2021 15.39.52.078 Write skip Rev : 1966

Horizontals, second pass LTO8 servo data

  • 01/18/2021 16.21.07.437 Servo stop write Fwd : 0
  • 01/18/2021 16.21.07.453 Servo stop write Rev : 15
  • 01/18/2021 16.21.07.468 Write skip Fwd : 370
  • 01/18/2021 16.21.07.484 Write skip Rev : 1964

Vertical, first pass LTO8 servo data

  • 01/18/2021 15.53.02.812 Servo stop write Fwd : 0
  • 01/18/2021 15.53.02.828 Servo stop write Rev : 152
  • 01/18/2021 15.53.02.859 Write skip Fwd : 427
  • 01/18/2021 15.53.02.875 Write skip Rev : 2363

by George Saliba

CONTINUED (see below link)